Pim Rijkee ( talk) 08:45, 25 March 2012 (UTC) Reply It is something to consider going forward, that's for sure. Comment I've been thinking along those lines myself, although I'm wondering if we can accomplish the same thing by keeping the main game at Angry Birds and discussing the overall franchise there, then have separate articles for the various games.Support Puls this game probably got WAY more than angry birds rio in it's first few days - Preceding unsigned comment added by Wweguy213 ( talk.It's an entire social phenomomom.- JOJ Hutton 17:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC) Reply Angry Birds is more than just a game now, it's also about merchandising and media. Support not only that, but this page needs to be renamed Angry Birds (Franchise) and articles created for each conception of the game.Qantasplanes (talk) 11:10, 24 March 2012 (UTC) Reply Strong Support - Yep, it's a huge difference from the previous games.I'm already having a vague idea of the structure of the article. Support - I can find a lot of third-party articles about reviews of the game (which thankfully are mostly positive), teasers, and the very extensive marketing the game has before release.This is a major title release by a major vendor and just like other video games release for systems like the Xbox 360 or PlayStation 3, major app store games should have their own articles. This also isn't a unknown app store release. Support The gameplay in the game is enough of a departure from the original to warrant it as a separate product.Since this name already exists (as a redirect back to Angry Birds), we're basically ready to go. As such, I believe that the game should have its own separate article, in order to discuss its particular gameplay mechanics. As more details about Angry Birds Space have emerged, the evidence is pretty clear that the game is a significant change from earlier Angry Birds titles.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |